• Stormy Weather for Clark County Stormwater Plan

    New story from the Public News Service – Washington:

    September 28, 2010

    Stormy Weather for Clark County Stormwater Plan

    TUMWATER, Wash. – How tough should counties be on developers in planning and controlling storm water runoff, a major source of water pollution? That’s the issue in a case to be argued this week at the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board. It alleges that Clark County has what amounts to a special deal with builders for managing the stormwater effects of their projects, allowing them to put off planning for runoff control and let the county take care of any problems.

    The Rosemere Neighborhood Association and two environmental groups behind the complaint – Columbia Riverkeeper and the Northwest Environmental Defense Center – say water quality has suffered as a result. Their attorney, Jan Hasselman with Earthjustice, explains.

    “Clark County is effectively subsidizing developers out of very limited county funds. The idea is that developers don’t have to take on the burden of dealing with the storm water from their projects – the county will pay for it from general funds.”

    The Washington Department of Ecology approved the Clark County plan, and will explain its reasons at the hearing. The problem, says Hasselman, is that if one county has a weaker storm water control policy, state law allows others to adopt it.

    “That’s why this case is so important, not just for Clark County, but statewide. This threatens to really undercut our collective efforts to begin improving the health of rivers and streams, and recover Puget Sound.”

    At issue is how strict counties should be with developers in order to meet federal Clean Water Act requirements. Clark County has said new development hasn’t posed much of a stormwater problem, and that it has enough money to mitigate such problems. The complaint asks that Clark County abide by the same standards as other counties.

    The hearing runs Tuesday, Sept. 28 to Friday, Oct. 1, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily, 1111 Israel Road SW, Tumwater.

    Click here to view this story on the Public News Service RSS site and access an audio version of this and other stories: http://www.publicnewsservice.org/index.php?/content/article/16097-1

  • Press Release: Pollution Control Board Hearing

    Press Release******Press Release******Press Release

    September 17, 2010

    Pollution panel to weigh closing illegal loopholes in Washington’s building rules and strong controls for polluted runoff

    WHAT: The Pollution Control Hearings Board will begin a trial to determine whether to throw out Clark County’s “special lopsided deal” under the state stormwater code.

    The County’s plan allows harmful development without proper runoff controls.

    The hearing raises issues of statewide importance, including the question of whether state vesting laws should trump efforts to protect rivers, streams and Puget Sound.

    The vesting law allows developers to build projects under whatever rules are in place when they file a development application. This lets developers avoid any new rules that may be adopted later, even if the rules are adopted before anything is actually built.

    WHEN: September 28, 2010 – October 1, 2010

    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

    WHERE: Pollution Control Hearings Board

    Environmental Hearings Offices—Room 301

    1111 Israel Road S.W.

    Tumwater, WA 98501

    CONTACTS: Jan Hasselman, Earthjustice, 206-719-6512 (cell)

    Dvija Michael Bertish, Rosemere Neighborhood Association, 360-281-4747

    Brett VandenHeuvel, Columbia Riverkeeper, 503-348-2436

    Mark Riskedahl, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, 503-768-6673

    BACKGROUND: In February 2010, local residents and clean water advocates filed a challenge to Clark County’s on-going failure to protect rivers, streams and comply with laws limiting stormwater pollution. The county’s contested plan was developed with the Department of Ecology, the agency charged with regulating Clark County under state law and the federal Clean Water Act.

    The public interest law firm Earthjustice filed an appeal on behalf of the Rosemere Neighborhood Association, Columbia Riverkeeper, and the Northwest Environmental Defense Center asking the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board to throw out a recent agreement between Clark County and the Washington Department of Ecology. Local residents and clean water advocates argue the state authorized inadequate development standards that will generate illegal stormwater pollution.

    Stormwater runoff is federally regulated as a major source of water pollution. It contains toxic metals, oil, grease, pesticides, herbicides, bacteria and nutrients. Last year, the Environmental Protection Agency released a startling report on toxics in the Columbia Basin, which identified stormwater as a leading cause of toxic pollution in the Basin. When stormwater runs off parking lots, buildings, and other urban development, it carries with it toxic metals, particularly copper and zinc, which harm salmon and other aquatic life.

    Under a lopsided deal reached in early January, Ecology agreed to allow Clark County to retain inadequate stormwater standards for new development in exchange for a promise to implement county funded stormwater mitigation projects.

    However, Clark County is already required to implement these projects under federal law. Additionally, the agreement allows Clark County to mitigate new development anywhere in the county, up to three years after the development occurs.

    The appealing groups are represented by attorneys Jan Hasselman and Janette Brimmer of Earthjustice.

    About the Pollution Control Hearings Board

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board acts like a court for appeals of state environmental regulations. The three board members hear appeals from orders and decisions made by the Department of Ecology and other agencies as provided by law. The Board’s function is to provide litigants a full and complete administrative hearing, as promptly as possible, followed by a fair and impartial written decision based on the facts and law. The Board is not affiliated with the Department of Ecology or any other state agency. The Board consists of three members, who are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the State Senate for staggered six-year terms.

Videos, Slideshows and Podcasts by Cincopa Wordpress Plugin

discount viagra
cheapest cialis
buy viagra prescription
non prescription viagra
non prescription viagra
buy viagra new york
best place to buy viagra
buy viagra mesa
buy discount cialis
cheapest viagra
buy cialis now
cheapest viagra
buy viagra online price
cheap viagra online
buy viagra online
20 mg cialis
buy viagra online reviews
viagra for sale
buy discount viagra
cheapest cialis
buy cheap cialis
buy discount viagra
discount viagra pills
buy viagra pill