<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rosemere Neighborhood Association &#187; Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosemerena.org/home/category/energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home</link>
	<description>Dedicated to promoting the welfare of our neighborhood, our community, and our environment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 03:42:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Breaking News: WA Gov Inslee Rejects Oil Terminal</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2018/01/29/breaking-news-wa-gov-inslee-rejects-oil-terminal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2018/01/29/breaking-news-wa-gov-inslee-rejects-oil-terminal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 01:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media/Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storm Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efsec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Inslee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=2177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a huge victory for environmental organizations across the region, Washington Governor Inslee has officially shut down the proposed Tesoro Savage oil terminal. Press Release from Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC): Case Number: EF-131590 Inslee issues decision to reject permit for Vancouver Energy Distribution Terminal project Olympia, Wash. – Gov. Jay Inslee today notified state regulators that he agrees with their unanimous recommendation to reject Tesoro Savage&#8217;s application to build a new terminal at the Port of Vancouver. The decision follows a lengthy evaluation process by the state’s Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, which voted last November to deny the permit and last month submitted its recommendation to the governor. In his letter to EFSE, Inslee said several issues compelled his decision including seismic risks, the inability to sufficiently mitigate oil spill risks, and the potential safety risks of a fire or explosion. &#8220;The Council has thoroughly examined these and other issues and determined that it is not possible to adequately mitigate the risks, or eliminate the adverse impacts of the facility, to an acceptable level,” Inslee wrote. “When weighing all of the factors considered against the need for and potential benefits of the facility at this location, I believe the record reflects substantial evidence that the project does not meet the broad public interest standard necessary for the Council to recommend site certification.&#8221; Inslee also noted that the application was &#8220;unprecedented both in its scale and the scope of issues it raised.&#8221; &#8220;While this process has demonstrated that this particular project is wrong for this particular proposed location, I am confident that our ports will continue to play an important role in regional trade, and providing opportunities for jobs in clean energy.&#8221; Tesoro Savage has 30 days to appeal the governor’s decision in Thurston County Superior Court.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2018/01/29/breaking-news-wa-gov-inslee-rejects-oil-terminal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Port of Vancouver Extends Oil Terminal Lease</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2017/03/10/port-of-vancouver-extends-oil-terminal-lease/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2017/03/10/port-of-vancouver-extends-oil-terminal-lease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efsec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Inslee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesoro Savage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=2165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 2-1 vote Tuesday, Port of Vancouver Commissioners extended Vancouver Energy&#8217;s proposed oil terminal lease, ahead of the potential cancellation deadline of March 31. Under the current lease Vancouver Energy is paying the port $100,000 a month pending a final decision by the state. The proposed $210 million Tesoro Savage Vancouver Energy terminal would bring an estimated 360,000 barrels of crude oil to Vancouver per day and has been opposed by community and environmental groups, including Rosemere Neighborhood Association, since its initial proposal nearly 4 years ago. Eric LaBrant was the sole dissenting vote, cautioning his fellow commissioners, “Gentlemen, we’re being sold a bill of goods. We need to make a decision as a commission to move on, be done with this process, and to move on to the other things that are in store for us.” The oil terminal is currently being reviewed by Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) which is expected to give its recommendation to Washington Governor Inslee at any time. The final decision will be made by Governor Inslee. For more information read Columbian Newspaper article here. Contact Governor Inslee&#8217;s office to make your voice heard on the proposed Oil Terminal here. &#160;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2017/03/10/port-of-vancouver-extends-oil-terminal-lease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental Groups Clean Water Act Success: BSNF Railway Required to Cleanup Coal Pollution</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2017/03/05/environmental-groups-clean-water-act-success-bsnf-railway-required-to-cleanup-coal-pollution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2017/03/05/environmental-groups-clean-water-act-success-bsnf-railway-required-to-cleanup-coal-pollution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean water act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia riverkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends of the Columbia Gorge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puget Soundkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RE Sources for Sustainable Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane Riverkeeper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=2170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rosemere Neighborhood Association congratulates our environmental partners on their successful Clean Water Act lawsuit against BNSF Railway coal train pollution! The lawsuit was brought by our friends at Sierra Club, Puget Soundkeeper, Columbia Riverkeeper, Spokane Riverkeeper, RE Sources for Sustainable Communities, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), and Friends of the Columbia Gorge. In the settlement, BNSF will now pay $1 million to finance environmental cleanup throughout Washington state, including Bellingham, Puget Sound, Columbia River and Spokane River areas, and will be required to cleanup the Columbia River and Pacific Northwest waterways of coal dust, petroleum coke, and other other discharges from open-top coal train cars. You can read more in the Seattle Times here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2017/03/05/environmental-groups-clean-water-act-success-bsnf-railway-required-to-cleanup-coal-pollution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BREAKING:  Port of Vancouver Holds Oil Terminal Lease Amendment Public Hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/04/08/breaking-port-of-vancouver-holds-oil-terminal-lease-amendment-public-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/04/08/breaking-port-of-vancouver-holds-oil-terminal-lease-amendment-public-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 22:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media/Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesoro Savage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As we have reported, this August 1st marks the deadline for the Port of Vancouver to renew the lease for the Tesoro Savage Oil Terminal. Tesoro Savage has approached the Port with a proposed 2-year extension to renew the lease prior to the August 1 deadline. The Port&#8217;s staff, although still on record supporting the Tesoro project, recommends against the lease renewal, citing growing concerns with the terminal moving forward. Port Commissioners will vote on the lease renewal on Friday April 15th and are holding a public hearing next Tuesday at Clark College to hear public testimony in advance of their vote on the lease renewal. A quite different slate of Port Commissioners will vote this time compared to those on the commission in 2013 when the lease was first approved after massive public opposition.  With the addition of Eric LaBrant last year, a staunch opponent to the terminal, the three Port Commissioners are now divided in their support.  Commissioner Brian Wolfe is also now voicing his own concerns with the Tesoro project. From the Columbian: Wolfe, who has become the three-member commission’s swing vote on the oil terminal lease changes, said he won’t make up his mind on his vote until after Tuesday’s daylong public hearing at Clark College’s Gaiser Hall. The commission expects to vote on the request on April 15. “My position today is I’m still going to listen to everybody next week and try to do at the end of the week what’s best for the Port of Vancouver,” said Wolfe, who backed the initial lease agreement. Eric LaBrant was not a member when the commission unanimously approved the original lease in 2013. But he won his seat on an anti-terminal platform, easily beating a staunch terminal supporter. Commissioner Jerry Oliver remains a supporter of the<a class="more-link" href="http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/04/08/breaking-port-of-vancouver-holds-oil-terminal-lease-amendment-public-hearing/">[Read More...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/04/08/breaking-port-of-vancouver-holds-oil-terminal-lease-amendment-public-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: New Hurdles for Proposed Oil Terminal</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/03/05/update-new-hurdles-for-proposed-oil-terminal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/03/05/update-new-hurdles-for-proposed-oil-terminal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2016 00:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media/Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Wolfe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia riverkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efsec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northwest Environmental Defense Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sierra club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=2091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our friends at Columbia Riverkeeper, Northwest Environmental Defense Center (NEDC), and Sierra Club learned this week that the Washington State Supreme Court will review the previous lower court rulings in their lawsuit  challenging the Port of Vancouver&#8217;s closed-door meetings in 2013 during the port’s initial consideration of the Tesoro Savage Oil Terminal lease. If they are successful, and win at the Supreme Court level, the potential result could be the court voiding the current lease agreement. From the Columbian: “If we were to prevail at the Supreme Court, we believe the remedy the court should give us is voiding the lease and asking the Port of Vancouver to make a new decision on the lease in light of the information in a final environmental impact statement,” said attorney Miles Johnson with Columbia Riverkeeper. That is not the only challenge facing the Port&#8217;s lease agreement. As the deadline looms for the Port to confirm the terminal lease this summer on August 1st, Port Commissioner Brian Wolfe is re-thinking his support for the project: Late Thursday, Commissioner Brian Wolfe told The Columbian that he hadn’t made up his mind about how he might cast another vote. “Am I prepared to make a decision on it? No,” Wolfe said. “I honestly don’t know; there are so many variables to consider.” Wolfe’s uncertainty turns what was a 3-0 decision nearly three years ago into a big maybe. “It was and will remain a really hard decision between economic development and the environment, in my mind,” Wolfe said. The other two Port Commissioners are divided; Jerry Oliver is expected to re-affirm his support for the terminal, and Eric Labrant,  the newest commissioner, is a longtime opponent to the project, so Wolfe&#8217;s vote could sway the lease vote this summer. And just this past week, local<a class="more-link" href="http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/03/05/update-new-hurdles-for-proposed-oil-terminal/">[Read More...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/03/05/update-new-hurdles-for-proposed-oil-terminal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFSEC Receives Record Number of Comments on Oil Terminal Proposal</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/02/17/efsec-receives-record-number-of-comments-on-oil-terminal-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/02/17/efsec-receives-record-number-of-comments-on-oil-terminal-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efsec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multnomah county]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sightline institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spokane City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spokesman-review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stand up to oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the oregonian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=2075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following record breaking attendance at open hearings in Vancouver and Spokane, EFSEC, Washington State&#8217;s Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, is now tasked with sifting through the volume of public input regarding the proposed Tesoro Savage Oil Terminal at the Port of Vancouver.  A record number of public comments &#8211; more than 250,000 &#8211; were submitted to EFSEC during the DEIS public comment period that ended January 22. Opposition to the terminal has been unprecedented, from such diverse organizations as Vancouver City Council, City of Portland, Multnomah County Commissioners, Vancouver Firefighters Union IAFF Local 452, ILWU Local 4, Columbia Waterfront LLC, Columbia River Inter-tribal Fish Commission, the sport fishing community, and the environmental community. Vancouver City Council voted to extend its moratorium on crude oil-handling facilities for another six months, their third extension in two years. Vancouver&#8217;s Comments on Draft EIS called the DEIS &#8220;wholly indadequate&#8221; and it&#8217;s &#8220;risk analysis is fatally flawed.&#8221; Even the Washington Attorney General called out EFSEC&#8217;s DEIS &#8220;&#8230;two significant deficiencies in the DEIS: (1) a flawed statistical analysis of train-derailment risk, and (2) insufficient analysis of the effort and investment required to bring first responders along the crude-oil-train route contemplated by the Tesoro-Savage project to a proper state of preparedness.&#8221; Rosemere Neighborhood Association has been vocal in its opposition to the terminal. The environmental risks posed by the terminal as outlined in the DEIS are too great and create excessive and unnecessary dangers to our communities and our precious water resources. RNA public commentary urges EFSEC members do everything in their power to deny the project and recommend Governor Inslee reject the Tesoro-Savage oil terminal. Read the full text of Rosemere Neighborhood Association Oil Terminal DEIS comments here. EFSEC has announced there will be a series of &#8220;adjudication hearings&#8221; this June, where the various stakeholders in the<a class="more-link" href="http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/02/17/efsec-receives-record-number-of-comments-on-oil-terminal-proposal/">[Read More...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2016/02/17/efsec-receives-record-number-of-comments-on-oil-terminal-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFSEC Scoping Hearing for Tesoro Savage Crude Oil Project</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2013/10/27/efsec-scoping-hearing-for-crude-oil-tesoro-savage-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2013/10/27/efsec-scoping-hearing-for-crude-oil-tesoro-savage-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crude Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia riverkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efsec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Inslee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port of Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As has been reported this week, the Port of Vancouver held a second vote and again unanimously approved the proposed Tesoro/Savage Crude Oil Terminal, the largest such facility in the Pacific Northwest. The Tesoro/Savage project now faces a yearlong examination by the Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (or EFSEC). EFSEC will make a recommendation to Washington Governor Inslee on the project and, then, the Governor will make the final decision to deny or approve the terminal. There are 2 important EFSEC meetings regarding the proposed Crude Oil Terminal coming up this week. It is important for everyone to attend these meetings and voice their opposition to the Tesoro Savage Terminal. Tuesday, October 29 EFSEC Scoping Hearing for Tesoro Savage Project The purpose of this hearing is for the public to ask EFSEC to review and to take into account the total pollution load to the environment from start to finish. When: Tuesday, October 29 &#8211; 6:00 – 9:00 PM Where: Clark College, Gaiser Student Center (1933 Fort Vancouver Way) There will also be a rally outside before the meeting at 5:00 PM ALSO: The night before – Monday, October 28 &#8211; EFSEC Public Information Hearing at 6:00 PM. What: EFSEC Public Information Hearing When: Monday, October 28 &#8211; 6:00PM Where: Clark College, Gaiser Student Center (1933 Fort Vancouver Way) Columbia Riverkeeper has a petition on their website for those who wish to sign and send a message to Governor Inslee and EFSEC to “Deny the Proposed Tesoro Savage Pipeline-on-Wheels Project”. You can find the petition here: Deny the Proposed Tesoro Savage Pipeline-on-Wheels Project]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2013/10/27/efsec-scoping-hearing-for-crude-oil-tesoro-savage-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Communities’ Letter on EPA’s Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/07/28/communities%e2%80%99-letter-on-epa%e2%80%99s-final-vapor-intrusion-guidance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/07/28/communities%e2%80%99-letter-on-epa%e2%80%99s-final-vapor-intrusion-guidance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 20:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media/Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquifer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indoor air testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Kapuscinski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=1905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 26, 2012, a letter was sent to EPA&#8217;s Richard Kapuscinski from environmental organizations and citizens groups from all over the country &#8211; including Rosemere Neighborhood Association &#8211; concerned about EPA’s pending Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance. The letter begins: We, the undersigned are concerned that pressure from polluters, chemical producers, and property owners may weaken elements of EPA’s pending Vapor Intrusion Guidance, and we urge EPA to adopt an investigatory approach that is truly protective of Americans exposed to highly toxic vapors in their homes, schools, workplaces, and other buildings. On July 6, 2012, Inside EPA, reported: Industry is criticizing EPA&#8217;s approach to calculating the potential for subsurface contamination to migrate to indoor air, raising concerns over a technical document expected to be a component of the agency’s final vapor intrusion guidance and over a Region III proposal to offer government-funded mitigation for vapor intrusion at homes near a Superfund site in Pennsylvania. Industry argues the so-called attenuation factors in the EPA documents are unnecessarily conservative and flawed because of incorrect assumptions of the rate at which contamination flows into residences. The determination whether vapor intrusion poses a health threat at any existing building should not be based solely upon models and predictions. Models cannot account for changes in operating conditions, occupancy, building modifications, or structural changes such as adding utility lines that penetrate floors or settling that cracks slabs. One test is worth 1000 expert opinions. Decisions should be based upon multiple lines of evidence, including indoor air testing, subslab soil-gas sampling, and outdoor air monitoring. To read the entire letter: Communities’ Letter on EPA’s Final Vapor Intrusion Guidance]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/07/28/communities%e2%80%99-letter-on-epa%e2%80%99s-final-vapor-intrusion-guidance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power Past Coal Campaign &#8211; RNA letter to Vancouver City Council</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/06/25/power-past-coal-campaign-rna-letter-to-vancouver-city-council/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/06/25/power-past-coal-campaign-rna-letter-to-vancouver-city-council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media/Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Kennedy Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 19, 2012, Rosemere Neighborhood Association submitted a letter to Vancouver Mayor, City Council and City Managers asking the City of Vancouver to join in the efforts by Governor Kitzhaber and Senator Patty Murray to call for a regional Environmental Impact Statement regarding the doubling of international coal exports through the Pacific Northwest. Seven mega coal terminals are proposed to ship 157 million tons of coal annually to China. The coal trains will flow daily through Vancouver, spewing toxic residue with each train. Excerpted from the letter, which was presented at Vancouver City Council meeting, Monday, June 25, 2012: Facing the slowing of U.S. coal fired power plants, coal companies like Massey and Arch Coal are looking to harvest and ship an additional 157 million tons of coal per year, sending 30 &#8211; 60 trains per day through the Columbia River Gorge via Portland and Vancouver, where it is intended to be shipped to Asia. Each and every car from a coal train can unleash 500 pounds of coal dust. The coal trains proposed to run through Portland and Vancouver will be 75 miles long, each day making the Pacific Northwest the largest coal chute in the nation, originating in Montana’s Powder Ridge Basin. There are various international coal export terminals proposed for Oregon and Washington, and should they proceed unabated, the health and environmental impacts to our region and our way life will be substantial. To view the letter in its entirety: Coal to City Council]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/06/25/power-past-coal-campaign-rna-letter-to-vancouver-city-council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power Past Coal Rally, Pioneer Courthouse Square, Portland Oregon</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/05/08/power-past-coal-rally-pioneer-courthouse-square-portland-oregon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/05/08/power-past-coal-rally-pioneer-courthouse-square-portland-oregon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia riverkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millennium Bulk Terminals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Past Coal Rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Kennedy Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterkeeper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=1833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Power Past Coal Rally began at noon on a bright, sunny, spring day with a chant from various members of the Riverkeeper Alliance: "Clean Coal is a Dirty Lie!"

Power Past Coal Rally At Portland's Pioneer Courthouse Square 5-7-12
    Power Past Coal Rally At Portland's Pioneer Courthouse Square 5-7-12

Columbia Riverkeeper, Sierra Club, Climate Solutions and Greenpeace sponsored the Power Past Coal event with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Environmental Attorney and Chairman of the Waterkeeper Alliance, as the featured speaker. Kennedy, who has been working against coal for more than 30 years, has been dubbed "Hero of the Planet" by Time Magazine.

Facing the slowing of U.S. coal fired power plants, coal companies like Massey and Arch Coal are looking to harvest and ship 150 million tons of coal per year, sending 30 -50 trains per day through the Columbia River Gorge via Portland and Vancouver Neighborhoods, where it is intended to be shipped to China. Each car from a coal train can unleash 500 pounds of coal dust. The coal trains proposed to run through Portland and Vancouver will be 75 miles long each day making the Pacific Northwest the largest coal chute in the nation, originating in Montana's Powder Ridge Basin.

Toxins emanating from the transport and burning of coal include mercury, arsenic, lead, sulphur dioxide, and ozone among 50 known contaminants. Health impacts, especially for young children, include mental retardation, impacts to speech and gait, lung and liver damage, autism and blindness. Estimates show that 300,000 to 600,000 children are exposed to high levels of mercury each year stemming from the coal industry. Coal emissions also exacerbate asthma, emphysema, can cause cancer, and contaminate rivers and fish, and can also reduce rainfall and snow pack caused by climate change. Just last week, Portland General Electric opposed the placement of a coal terminal near its power plant because dirty coal would hamper plant operations, and Oregon's Governor Kitzhaber requested a regional Environmental Impact Study to identify public health and environmental impacts expected from seven proposed coal terminals in Oregon and Washington State. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2012/05/08/power-past-coal-rally-pioneer-courthouse-square-portland-oregon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
