<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rosemere Neighborhood Association &#187; Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rosemerena.org/home/tag/northeast-coalition-of-neighborhoods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home</link>
	<description>Dedicated to promoting the welfare of our neighborhood, our community, and our environment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 03:42:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>PEAC Comments on Final Environmental Impact Statement for I-5 Columbia River Crossing Project</title>
		<link>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2011/10/25/peac-comments-on-final-environmental-impact-statement-for-i-5-columbia-river-crossing-project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2011/10/25/peac-comments-on-final-environmental-impact-statement-for-i-5-columbia-river-crossing-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia River Crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media/Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sole Source Aquifer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storm Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquifer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Oregon Rail and Trail Advocates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition for a Livable Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia river crossing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columbia riverkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Legal Clinic of Lewis & Clark Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northwest Environmental Defense Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon Public Health Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland Audubon Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosemere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstream Public Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rosemerena.org/home/?p=1750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center (“PEAC”), the Environmental Legal Clinic of Lewis &#38; Clark Law School, has submitted comments on behalf of a coalition of environmental groups on the Columbia River Crossing Project (&#8220;CRC&#8221;) Final Environmental Impact Statement. PEAC clients include Rosemere Neighborhood Association, Coalition for a Livable Future, the Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Columbia Riverkeeper, the Portland Audubon Society, Oregon Public Health Institute, Upstream Public Health, and Association of Oregon Rail and Trail Advocates. PEAC also states that although it specifically represents these groups, it is &#8220;in fact representing the concerns and views of a broad and diverse coalition of groups.&#8221; To date, CRC has established a pattern of ignoring input from these environmental and stakeholder groups concerned about the proposed bridge design impacts to our sole source aquifer, surface and groundwater resources, salmon, air quality, general public health concerns and other environmental impacts. In this document PEAC details all these concerns and the various technical reports behind them, finding, Overall it is remarkable how much incomplete and missing analysis is found when the public reviews this FEIS, which has already cost Oregon and Washington taxpayers more than $130 million. This would be Oregon’s largest public works project, and its taxpayers and the taxpayers of Washington are entitled to a much more thorough and complete analysis, a true comparison of all reasonable alternatives that “sharply defines the issues and provide[s] a clear basis of choice among options” (40 C.F.R. § 1502.14), and a meaningful opportunity to review and comment on all of those things in a supplemental DEIS. While the coalition is not &#8220;anti-bridge&#8221;, it does charge CRC with the responsibility to not harm our environment, destroy our resources or our community and to be fiscally responsible. PEAC concludes with, For all the reasons set forth<a class="more-link" href="http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2011/10/25/peac-comments-on-final-environmental-impact-statement-for-i-5-columbia-river-crossing-project/">[Read More...]</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rosemerena.org/home/2011/10/25/peac-comments-on-final-environmental-impact-statement-for-i-5-columbia-river-crossing-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
